hockey: is bad sport

Property	Similarity
is bad sport	1.00
is good sport	0.97
is sport	0.94
be sport	0.94
be good sport play	0.92
is great sport	0.92
is best sport	0.92
is dangerous sport	0.91
be good sport involved	0.90
be good sport involved in	0.90

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(hockey, is sport)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(hockey, is good sport)

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(hockey, be sport)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(hockey, is sport)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(hockey, is good sport)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(hockey, be sport)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(hockey, is sport)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(hockey, be sport)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(hockey, is good sport)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(hockey, be good sport play)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(hockey, is great sport)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(hockey, is best sport)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(hockey, be good sport involved in)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(hockey, be good sport play)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(hockey, be good sport involved in)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(hockey, is great sport)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(hockey, is best sport)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(hockey, be good sport play)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(hockey, is great sport)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(hockey, be good sport involved in)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(hockey, is best sport)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(hockey, is good sport)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hockey, is best sport)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(hockey, be good sport play)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(hockey, is great sport)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(hockey, be good sport involved in)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(hockey, is sport)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(hockey, is bad sport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(hockey, be sport)

Parents	game Weight: 0.63 , sport Weight: 0.63 , activity Weight: 0.60 , athlete Weight: 0.57 , sports equipment Weight: 0.57
Siblings	hockey game Weight: 0.41 , ice hockey Weight: 0.39 , hockey player Weight: 0.39 , hockey stick Weight: 0.38 , play hockey Weight: 0.37

hockey: is bad sport

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings