hockey: players

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
players 1.00
is game 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hockey, players) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, is game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(hockey, players) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ice hockey, is game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, is game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(hockey, players) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hockey, players)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(hockey, players) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is game)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(hockey, players) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(hockey, is game)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(hockey, players) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hockey, is game)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(hockey, players) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hockey, is game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(hockey, players) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hockey, players) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hockey, players)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(hockey, players) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hockey, players)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hockey, players) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(ice hockey, is game)