hockey: use ball

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
use ball 1.00
use puck 0.80
be played on wet pitch 0.76
play 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(game, play)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(hockey, use ball)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(athlete, play)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(hockey, use ball)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(athlete, play)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(game, play)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(athlete, play)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(game, play)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(game, play)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(hockey, use ball)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(athlete, play)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(hockey, use ball)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hockey, use ball)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hockey, use puck)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hockey, play)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(hockey, be played on wet pitch)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hockey, use puck)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(hockey, use puck)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hockey, play)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hockey, play)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hockey, play)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(hockey, use puck)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hockey, use ball)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(hockey, use ball)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(game, play)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(athlete, play)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(game, play)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(hockey, use ball)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(athlete, play)