hockey: was developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was developed 1.00
was created 0.83
was invented 0.81
was formed 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was invented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was created)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ice hockey, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, was created)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ice hockey, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(hockey, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hockey, was created)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(hockey, was formed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(hockey, was invented)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hockey, was formed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hockey, was created)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hockey, was created)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hockey, was formed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was invented)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was created)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hockey, was invented)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hockey, was invented)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hockey, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ice hockey, was created)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ice hockey, was invented)