hockey: was during 1920s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was during 1920s 1.00
was made 0.79
was though up 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was during 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was made)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hockey, was during 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ice hockey, was made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, was made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hockey, was during 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(hockey, was during 1920s)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hockey, was during 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hockey, was made)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hockey, was during 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hockey, was though up)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hockey, was during 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hockey, was made)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(hockey, was during 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was made)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hockey, was during 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(hockey, was though up)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hockey, was during 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hockey, was made)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(hockey, was during 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was though up)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hockey, was during 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(hockey, was though up)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hockey, was during 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hockey, was during 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was during 1920s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hockey, was during 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hockey, was during 1920s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was during 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ice hockey, was made)