hockey: was made

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was made 1.00
be made 0.95
was during 1920s 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was made)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(hockey stick, be made)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ice hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, was made)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(hockey stick, be made)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(hockey stick, be made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hockey, was made)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hockey, be made)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hockey, be made)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(hockey, be made)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was during 1920s)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be made)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(hockey, was during 1920s)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hockey, was during 1920s)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hockey, was during 1920s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was made)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hockey, was made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ice hockey, was made)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was made)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hockey stick, be made)