hockey: was played

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was played 1.00
be played 0.98
is played in winter 0.87
be played on ice 0.86
play 0.82
be played on wet field 0.82
be played on wet pitch 0.82
was played in 1980 summer olympics 0.81
be considered as game 0.77
is game 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(game, play)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hockey, was played)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(athlete, play)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hockey, was played)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(athlete, play)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(game, play)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(athlete, play)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(game, play)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, be played)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, is game)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(game, play)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hockey, was played)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(athlete, play)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hockey, was played)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(ice hockey, be played)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, be played)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ice hockey, is game)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, is game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hockey, was played)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is played in winter)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(hockey, be played)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was played in 1980 summer olympics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(hockey, be played)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on wet pitch)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hockey, be played)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(hockey, was played in 1980 summer olympics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(hockey, be played on wet pitch)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hockey, be played on ice)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hockey, is played in winter)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hockey, be played on ice)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hockey, be played on ice)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hockey, play)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hockey, play)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be played on ice)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hockey, be played on wet pitch)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(hockey, was played in 1980 summer olympics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hockey, play)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hockey, is played in winter)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hockey, play)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hockey, is game)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be considered as game)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(hockey, is game)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hockey, is game)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hockey, is game)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hockey, be played on wet pitch)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hockey, be considered as game)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hockey, is played in winter)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hockey, was played in 1980 summer olympics)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hockey, be considered as game)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hockey, be considered as game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was played)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hockey, was played)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(game, play)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(athlete, play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ice hockey, be played)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(ice hockey, is game)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(game, play)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hockey, was played)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(athlete, play)