hockey: was though up

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was though up 1.00
was during 1920s 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(hockey, was though up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(hockey, was though up)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(hockey, was though up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(hockey, was during 1920s)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hockey, was though up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was during 1920s)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(hockey, was though up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hockey, was during 1920s)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hockey, was though up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hockey, was during 1920s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(hockey, was though up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hockey, was though up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was though up)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(hockey, was though up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hockey, was though up)