hold: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.51
, condition
Weight: 0.50
Siblings other place
Weight: 0.33
, stand
Weight: 0.32
, lock
Weight: 0.31
, hinge
Weight: 0.31
, roll
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is bad quality 0.98
have quality 0.89
is terrible quality 0.89
have poor quality 0.89
is poor quality 0.88
is quality 0.87
have poor sound quality 0.85
is low quality 0.82
have sound quality 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hold, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lock, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(stand, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(hold, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(stand, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(stand, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(lock, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(lock, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hold, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hold, have quality)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hold, have sound quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hold, have quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hold, is bad quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hold, is bad quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hold, is bad quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hold, is quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hold, is bad quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hold, have poor quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hold, have sound quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(hold, have quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hold, have poor quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hold, is terrible quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hold, is quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(hold, have poor quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hold, is poor quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(hold, is terrible quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(hold, is terrible quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(hold, is quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(hold, have sound quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(hold, is poor quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hold, is poor quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(hold, have poor quality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hold, is poor quality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hold, is low quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hold, is low quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hold, is quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hold, is low quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hold, is low quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(hold, have quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(hold, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(stand, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(lock, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(hold, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)