hold: have quality

Related concepts

Parents	feature Weight: 0.59 , service Weight: 0.56 , place Weight: 0.55 , option Weight: 0.51 , condition Weight: 0.50
Siblings	other place Weight: 0.33 , stand Weight: 0.32 , lock Weight: 0.31 , hinge Weight: 0.31 , roll Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have quality	1.00
is quality	0.95
has quality bad	0.89
is bad quality	0.88
have poor quality	0.87
have sound quality	0.87
have poor sound quality	0.85
is poor quality	0.84
is low quality	0.84
is terrible quality	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(hold, have quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(lock, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(stand, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(hold, have quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(stand, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(stand, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(lock, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(lock, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(hold, have quality)

Similarity expansion

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(hold, is quality)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(hold, has quality bad)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(hold, is bad quality)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(hold, have poor quality)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(hold, is poor quality)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(hold, have poor sound quality)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(hold, is low quality)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(hold, have sound quality)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(hold, has quality bad)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(hold, is quality)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(hold, have poor sound quality)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(hold, have sound quality)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(hold, have sound quality)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(hold, have poor sound quality)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(hold, is bad quality)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(hold, have poor quality)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(hold, have poor sound quality)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(hold, is quality)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(hold, is poor quality)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(hold, has quality bad)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(hold, is low quality)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(hold, is quality)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(hold, is terrible quality)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(hold, have poor quality)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(hold, is bad quality)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(hold, have poor quality)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(hold, is terrible quality)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(hold, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(hold, is poor quality)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(hold, is low quality)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(hold, is bad quality)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(hold, is terrible quality)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(hold, is low quality)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(hold, is poor quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(hold, have quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(hold, have quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(service, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(stand, has quality bad)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(lock, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.19

Typical(hold, have quality) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(service, is quality)