hold: sound terrible

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.51
, condition
Weight: 0.50
Siblings other place
Weight: 0.33
, stand
Weight: 0.32
, lock
Weight: 0.31
, hinge
Weight: 0.31
, roll
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
sound terrible 1.00
sound bad 0.93
be terrible in 2016 0.90
is terrible quality 0.89
sound terribly bad 0.87
has sound sound 0.86
have poor sound quality 0.85
have sound quality 0.83
is sound ever 0.80
is obnoxious sound 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hold, sound terrible)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hold, have sound quality)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hold, has sound sound)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(hold, be terrible in 2016)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(hold, sound bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hold, sound bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hold, be terrible in 2016)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(hold, sound bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hold, be terrible in 2016)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hold, be terrible in 2016)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hold, sound bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(hold, is obnoxious sound)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hold, have sound quality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(hold, has sound sound)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hold, is terrible quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hold, is obnoxious sound)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hold, sound terribly bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hold, is obnoxious sound)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hold, sound terribly bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hold, is obnoxious sound)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(hold, sound terribly bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(hold, sound terribly bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hold, is sound ever)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(hold, is terrible quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(hold, has sound sound)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(hold, have sound quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(hold, is terrible quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hold, is terrible quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(hold, is sound ever)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hold, is sound ever)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hold, is sound ever)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(hold, have poor sound quality)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hold, has sound sound)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hold, have sound quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hold, sound terrible)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hold, sound terrible)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hold, sound terrible)