holder: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.57
, member
Weight: 0.56
Siblings one person
Weight: 0.34
, third person
Weight: 0.32
, record player
Weight: 0.32
, homeless person
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
have job 0.95
has state jobs 0.88
is job description 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(holder, has state job)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(holder, have job)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(holder, have job)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(holder, have job)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(holder, have job)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(holder, has state jobs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(holder, is job description)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(holder, has state jobs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(holder, is job description)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(holder, is job description)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(holder, has state jobs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(holder, has state jobs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(holder, is job description)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(holder, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(holder, has state job)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(holder, has state job)