hole: sucks in things

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, black hole
Weight: 0.61
, form
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.59
Siblings par
Weight: 0.60
, asshole
Weight: 0.56
, third base
Weight: 0.55
, eye socket
Weight: 0.52
, slit
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
sucks in things 1.00
suck in stuff 0.89
suck up things 0.88
suck everything 0.87
suck everything into space 0.83
suck in light 0.81
suck everything into small space 0.80
suck in objects 0.78
look like poop 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(black hole, suck in light)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hole, sucks in things)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(black hole, suck in objects)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hole, sucks in things)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(black hole, suck in light)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(black hole, suck in objects)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(black hole, suck in light)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(black hole, suck in objects)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(black hole, suck in light)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hole, sucks in things)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(black hole, suck in objects)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hole, sucks in things)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hole, sucks in things)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hole, suck in stuff)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hole, suck in stuff)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hole, suck in light)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(hole, suck in light)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hole, suck in stuff)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(hole, suck in objects)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hole, suck in objects)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hole, suck in light)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hole, suck in stuff)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(hole, suck in objects)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hole, suck in objects)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hole, suck in light)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hole, sucks in things)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hole, sucks in things)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(black hole, suck in objects)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(black hole, suck in light)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(black hole, suck in objects)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(hole, sucks in things)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(black hole, suck in light)