home: be at michigan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.61
, classroom
Weight: 0.59
, relative
Weight: 0.59
, hobby
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hotel room
Weight: 0.69
, home owner
Weight: 0.66
, house
Weight: 0.65
, condominium
Weight: 0.62
, bungalow
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at michigan 1.00
be at florida 0.85
be at washington 0.80
be at new mexico 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(condominium, be at michigan)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, be at michigan)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(condominium, be at florida)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(condominium, be at washington)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(hotel room, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hotel room, be at michigan)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(condominium, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(condominium, be at michigan)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(condominium, be at florida)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(condominium, be at florida)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(condominium, be at washington)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(condominium, be at washington)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(home, be at michigan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(home, be at michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(home, be at michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condominium, be at michigan)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hotel room, be at michigan)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(condominium, be at florida)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(condominium, be at washington)