home: is business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.61
, visit
Weight: 0.60
, facility
Weight: 0.59
, possession
Weight: 0.58
Siblings home depot
Weight: 0.70
, hotel room
Weight: 0.69
, home owner
Weight: 0.66
, condominium
Weight: 0.62
, bungalow
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
is business 1.00
be important in business 0.92
be good company work 0.78
be good company work for 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(facility, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(home, is business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(home, is business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(facility, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(home, is business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(facility, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(home, is business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(home depot, be good company work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(home, is business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home depot, be good company work for)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(facility, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(home, is business)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(home, is business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(home, is business)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(home depot, be good company work)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(home depot, be good company work)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(home, is business)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(home depot, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(home depot, be good company work for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(home, is business)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(home, is business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(home, is business)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(home, is business)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(home, is business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(home, is business)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(home, is business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(home, is business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(facility, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(home, is business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(home depot, be good company work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(home, is business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(home depot, be good company work for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(home, is business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(facility, be important in business)