home: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.61
, visit
Weight: 0.60
, facility
Weight: 0.59
, possession
Weight: 0.58
Siblings home depot
Weight: 0.70
, hotel room
Weight: 0.69
, home owner
Weight: 0.66
, condominium
Weight: 0.62
, bungalow
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be expensive in acadiana 0.98
is more expensive 0.94
is expensive now 0.94
be expensive days 0.86
is expensive right now 0.86
be in city expensive 0.85
is cheaper 0.85
be in city more expensive 0.85
be expensive now days 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(visit, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(home, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(facility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(home, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(facility, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(visit, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(facility, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(visit, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(condominium, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bungalow, is cheaper)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(visit, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(home, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(facility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(home, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hotel room, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hotel room, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(condominium, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(condominium, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(bungalow, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bungalow, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bungalow, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bungalow, is more expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(bungalow, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(bungalow, is cheaper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(home, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(home, be in city more expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(home, be in city more expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(home, be in city more expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(home, be in city more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(home, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(visit, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(condominium, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bungalow, is more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bungalow, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hotel room, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bungalow, is cheaper)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(visit, is expensive)