homeowner: fence his yard

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mortgage
Weight: 0.63
, product
Weight: 0.56
, victim
Weight: 0.54
, neighbor
Weight: 0.54
, contractor
Weight: 0.54
Siblings roofer
Weight: 0.32
, drywall
Weight: 0.32
, plumber
Weight: 0.31
, builder
Weight: 0.31
, car battery
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
fence his yard 1.00
fence his her yard 0.98
paint fence 0.85
wall garden 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(homeowner, fence his yard)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(builder, wall garden)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(homeowner, fence his yard)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(builder, wall garden)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(builder, wall garden)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(homeowner, fence his yard)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(homeowner, fence his yard)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(homeowner, fence his yard)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(homeowner, fence his her yard)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(homeowner, fence his yard)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(homeowner, fence his her yard)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(homeowner, fence his yard)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(homeowner, fence his her yard)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(homeowner, fence his yard)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(homeowner, paint fence)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(homeowner, fence his yard)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(homeowner, paint fence)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(homeowner, fence his yard)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(homeowner, fence his her yard)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(homeowner, fence his yard)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(homeowner, paint fence)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(homeowner, fence his yard)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(homeowner, paint fence)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(homeowner, fence his yard)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(homeowner, fence his yard)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(homeowner, fence his yard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(homeowner, fence his yard)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(homeowner, fence his yard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(homeowner, fence his yard)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(builder, wall garden)