honda: be good on gas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motorcycle
Weight: 0.69
, brand
Weight: 0.62
, bike
Weight: 0.58
, vehicle
Weight: 0.58
, competitor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mercedes benz
Weight: 0.71
, honda civic
Weight: 0.65
, subaru
Weight: 0.36
, toyota
Weight: 0.36
, nissan
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good on gas 1.00
burn oil 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(honda, be good on gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(toyota, burn oil)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(honda, be good on gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(subaru, burn oil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(honda, be good on gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(subaru, burn oil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(subaru, burn oil)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(honda, be good on gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(toyota, burn oil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(toyota, burn oil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(honda, be good on gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(honda, be good on gas)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(honda, be good on gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(honda, burn oil)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(honda, be good on gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(honda, burn oil)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(honda, be good on gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(honda, burn oil)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(honda, be good on gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(honda, burn oil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(honda, be good on gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(honda, be good on gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(honda, be good on gas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(honda, be good on gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(honda, be good on gas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(honda, be good on gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(subaru, burn oil)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(honda, be good on gas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(toyota, burn oil)