honeycomb: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.51
, tablet
Weight: 0.51
, material
Weight: 0.50
, object
Weight: 0.49
, cereal
Weight: 0.46
Siblings aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.33
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.32
, titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.32
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.32
, globular cluster
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is more expensive 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(honeycomb, is expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tablet, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(honeycomb, is expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cereal, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(honeycomb, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cereal, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tablet, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cereal, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(aluminum oxide, is expensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(honeycomb, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tablet, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(honeycomb, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cereal, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(honeycomb, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(aluminum oxide, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(aluminum oxide, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(honeycomb, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(honeycomb, is more expensive)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(honeycomb, is more expensive)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(honeycomb, is more expensive)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(honeycomb, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(honeycomb, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(honeycomb, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cereal, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tablet, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(aluminum oxide, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cereal, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tablet, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(honeycomb, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)