hong kong: be good for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sar
Weight: 0.64
, new zealand
Weight: 0.63
, east asia
Weight: 0.62
, malaysia
Weight: 0.62
Siblings taiwan
Weight: 0.65
, seoul
Weight: 0.53
, macau
Weight: 0.46
, shenzhen
Weight: 0.45
, guangzhou
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for business 1.00
is good country 0.80
has quality good 0.80
be good at little league 0.77
is nice country 0.77
is great 0.77
has quality bad 0.76
is great country 0.76
be good place live 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new zealand, is great country)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hong kong, be good for business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(new zealand, is nice country)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hong kong, be good for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(new zealand, is nice country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(new zealand, is great country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, is great country)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, is nice country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(taiwan, be good at little league)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(macau, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new zealand, is great country)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hong kong, be good for business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(new zealand, is nice country)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hong kong, be good for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(taiwan, be good at little league)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(taiwan, be good at little league)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(macau, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(macau, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hong kong, be good for business)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(hong kong, be good place live)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hong kong, is great)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(hong kong, be good place live)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hong kong, is great)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(hong kong, be good place live)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hong kong, is great)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, is great)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, be good place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, be good for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hong kong, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(new zealand, is nice country)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(new zealand, is great country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(taiwan, be good at little league)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(macau, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(new zealand, is nice country)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hong kong, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(new zealand, is great country)