hong kong: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sar
Weight: 0.64
, new zealand
Weight: 0.63
, east asia
Weight: 0.62
, malaysia
Weight: 0.62
Siblings taiwan
Weight: 0.65
, seoul
Weight: 0.53
, macau
Weight: 0.46
, shenzhen
Weight: 0.45
, guangzhou
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
is great country 0.91
be great place live 0.85
is amazing 0.84
is awesome 0.83
is nice country 0.82
has quality good 0.81
is big 0.80
is best 0.78
is good country 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new zealand, is great country)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hong kong, is great)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(new zealand, is nice country)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hong kong, is great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(new zealand, is great country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(new zealand, is nice country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, is great country)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, is nice country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(seoul, is big)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(shenzhen, is big)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new zealand, is great country)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hong kong, is great)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(new zealand, is nice country)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hong kong, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(shenzhen, is big)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(shenzhen, is big)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(seoul, is big)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(seoul, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hong kong, is great)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(hong kong, be great place live)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hong kong, be great place live)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hong kong, be great place live)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, be great place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hong kong, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(new zealand, is nice country)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(new zealand, is great country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(shenzhen, is big)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(seoul, is big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(new zealand, is great country)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hong kong, is great)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(new zealand, is nice country)