hong kong: was important to britain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sar
Weight: 0.64
, new zealand
Weight: 0.63
, east asia
Weight: 0.62
, malaysia
Weight: 0.62
Siblings taiwan
Weight: 0.65
, seoul
Weight: 0.53
, macau
Weight: 0.46
, shenzhen
Weight: 0.45
, guangzhou
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to britain 1.00
be called britain 0.96
be called britain of south 0.92
britain of south 0.91
is british 0.80
was important country to british empire 0.80
was important in korean war 0.80
was important to british empire 0.80
be important for india 0.80
is very british 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(east asia, be important for india)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hong kong, was important to britain)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hong kong, was important to britain)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(new zealand, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hong kong, was important to britain)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(malaysia, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hong kong, was important to britain)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new zealand, britain of south)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hong kong, was important to britain)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new zealand, be called britain of south)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hong kong, was important to britain)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(new zealand, be called britain of south)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(new zealand, britain of south)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(malaysia, was important to british empire)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was important to british empire)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(east asia, be important for india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, was important to british empire)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(east asia, be important for india)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was important to british empire)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, be called britain of south)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, britain of south)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(seoul, was important in korean war)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(new zealand, britain of south)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(new zealand, be called britain of south)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(east asia, be important for india)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(new zealand, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(malaysia, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(seoul, was important in korean war)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(seoul, was important in korean war)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(hong kong, was important to britain)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to british empire)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(hong kong, was important to british empire)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hong kong, was important to british empire)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hong kong, was important to british empire)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hong kong, was important to britain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new zealand, be called britain of south)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(new zealand, britain of south)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(new zealand, was important to british empire)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(malaysia, was important to british empire)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(east asia, be important for india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(seoul, was important in korean war)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new zealand, be called britain of south)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(new zealand, britain of south)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(new zealand, was important to british empire)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(malaysia, was important to british empire)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hong kong, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(east asia, be important for india)