hong kong: was military advantage for british empire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sar
Weight: 0.64
, new zealand
Weight: 0.63
, east asia
Weight: 0.62
, malaysia
Weight: 0.62
Siblings taiwan
Weight: 0.65
, seoul
Weight: 0.53
, macau
Weight: 0.46
, shenzhen
Weight: 0.45
, guangzhou
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
was military advantage for british empire 1.00
was military advantage for empire 0.94
was in british empire 0.91
was important to british empire 0.91
was important country to british empire 0.90
was in empire 0.84
was important country to empire 0.83
was important to empire 0.82
is british 0.81
is british colony 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(new zealand, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(malaysia, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(malaysia, was important to empire)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was in british empire)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(malaysia, was important to british empire)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was important to british empire)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(malaysia, was important to empire)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, was important to british empire)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was in british empire)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(new zealand, was important to british empire)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, was important to empire)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(new zealand, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(malaysia, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new zealand, was in british empire)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(malaysia, was important to empire)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(hong kong, is british colony)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hong kong, was important to british empire)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hong kong, is british colony)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hong kong, was important to british empire)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was important to british empire)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(hong kong, was important to british empire)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(hong kong, is british colony)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, is british colony)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(new zealand, was in british empire)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(new zealand, was important to british empire)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(malaysia, was important to british empire)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(malaysia, was important to empire)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(new zealand, was in british empire)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(new zealand, was important to british empire)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(malaysia, was important to british empire)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(new zealand, was important country to british empire)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(hong kong, was military advantage for british empire)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(malaysia, was important to empire)