honolulu: be called apple

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.59
, island
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.55
, port
Weight: 0.54
Siblings ellis island
Weight: 0.34
, hawaii
Weight: 0.33
, venice
Weight: 0.33
, miami
Weight: 0.33
, austin
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called apple 1.00
be called big apple 0.95
be called pineapple 0.77
be called big pineapple 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(honolulu, be called apple)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(honolulu, be called big apple)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(honolulu, be called pineapple)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(honolulu, be called big apple)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(honolulu, be called pineapple)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(honolulu, be called big apple)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(honolulu, be called pineapple)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(honolulu, be called big apple)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(honolulu, be called pineapple)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(honolulu, be called big pineapple)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(honolulu, be called big pineapple)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(honolulu, be called big pineapple)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(honolulu, be called big pineapple)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(honolulu, be called apple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(honolulu, be called apple)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(honolulu, be called apple)