hose: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.57
, radiator
Weight: 0.54
, tube
Weight: 0.54
, device
Weight: 0.53
Siblings garden hose
Weight: 0.78
, eustachian tube
Weight: 0.34
, endotracheal tube
Weight: 0.33
, fallopian tube
Weight: 0.33
, vacuum tube
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
go 0.87
be bad for kids 0.82
go cold 0.80
is terrible 0.79
has quality bad 0.79
do 0.78
come when i run 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(tube, be bad for kids)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hose, go bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(tube, be bad for kids)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tube, be bad for kids)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(tube, be bad for kids)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hose, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hose, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(hose, go)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(hose, go)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hose, go)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hose, go)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hose, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hose, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(hose, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(hose, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hose, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hose, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tube, be bad for kids)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(hose, go bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tube, be bad for kids)