hostess: seat customer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.56
, corporation
Weight: 0.55
, people
Weight: 0.51
, friend
Weight: 0.51
, girl
Weight: 0.50
Siblings waitress
Weight: 0.32
, bartender
Weight: 0.32
, niece
Weight: 0.32
, lady
Weight: 0.32
, receptionist
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
seat customer 1.00
supply customer with product 0.80
lie to their customer 0.79
be defined as not all person who serve customer 0.76
rush order to customer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(company, supply customer with product)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hostess, seat customer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(corporation, lie to their customer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hostess, seat customer)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(company, rush order to customer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hostess, seat customer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(corporation, lie to their customer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(company, rush order to customer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(company, supply customer with product)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(company, rush order to customer)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(corporation, lie to their customer)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(company, supply customer with product)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(waitress, seat customer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(waitress, be defined as not all person who serve customer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(company, supply customer with product)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hostess, seat customer)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(corporation, lie to their customer)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hostess, seat customer)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(company, rush order to customer)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hostess, seat customer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(waitress, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(waitress, seat customer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(waitress, be defined as not all person who serve customer)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(waitress, be defined as not all person who serve customer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(hostess, seat customer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hostess, seat customer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hostess, seat customer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(company, supply customer with product)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(corporation, lie to their customer)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(company, rush order to customer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(waitress, seat customer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(waitress, be defined as not all person who serve customer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(company, supply customer with product)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(corporation, lie to their customer)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hostess, seat customer)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(company, rush order to customer)