hot air: exerts less pressure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air
Weight: 0.73
, heating
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, source
Weight: 0.53
Siblings air conditioner
Weight: 0.37
, fresh air
Weight: 0.37
, hot water
Weight: 0.36
, air horn
Weight: 0.35
, hot spot
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
exerts less pressure 1.00
exerts pressure 0.98
exerts low pressure 0.97
is pressure 0.82
is low pressure 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(air, exerts pressure)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hot air, exerts less pressure)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(air, exerts pressure)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(air, exerts pressure)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(air, exerts pressure)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hot air, exerts less pressure)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(hot air, exerts less pressure)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(hot air, exerts pressure)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(hot air, exerts low pressure)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hot air, exerts pressure)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(hot air, exerts low pressure)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hot air, is pressure)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hot air, is low pressure)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hot air, exerts pressure)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(hot air, exerts low pressure)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hot air, exerts pressure)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(hot air, is pressure)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(hot air, exerts low pressure)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hot air, is low pressure)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(hot air, is pressure)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(hot air, is low pressure)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hot air, is low pressure)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hot air, is pressure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hot air, exerts less pressure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hot air, exerts less pressure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(air, exerts pressure)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(hot air, exerts less pressure)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(air, exerts pressure)