hot air: have density

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air
Weight: 0.73
, heating
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, source
Weight: 0.53
Siblings air conditioner
Weight: 0.37
, fresh air
Weight: 0.37
, hot water
Weight: 0.36
, air horn
Weight: 0.35
, hot spot
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have density 1.00
have lower density 0.94
is dense 0.78
become dense 0.76
is less dense 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(air, have density)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hot air, have density)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(air, is dense)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hot air, have density)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(air, become dense)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hot air, have density)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(air, have density)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(air, become dense)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(air, is dense)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(air, become dense)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(air, is dense)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(air, have density)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(air, have density)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hot air, have density)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(air, is dense)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hot air, have density)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(air, become dense)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hot air, have density)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(hot air, have density)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hot air, have lower density)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hot air, have lower density)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hot air, have lower density)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(hot air, have lower density)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hot air, is dense)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hot air, become dense)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot air, is less dense)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(hot air, is less dense)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hot air, is less dense)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(hot air, is less dense)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(hot air, is dense)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hot air, become dense)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hot air, become dense)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(hot air, is dense)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(hot air, become dense)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hot air, is dense)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot air, have density)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(hot air, have density)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(air, have density)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(air, become dense)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(air, is dense)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(air, have density)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(air, become dense)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(hot air, have density)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(air, is dense)