hot dog: be at bowl alley

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, soft drink
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bowl alley 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fast food, be at bowl alley)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hot dog, be at bowl alley)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(hot dog, be at bowl alley)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at bowl alley)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be at bowl alley)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at bowl alley)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fast food, be at bowl alley)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hot dog, be at bowl alley)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be at bowl alley)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(hot dog, be at bowl alley)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(hot dog, be at bowl alley)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(hot dog, be at bowl alley)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hot dog, be at bowl alley)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be at bowl alley)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(hot dog, be at bowl alley)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hot dog, be at bowl alley)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be at bowl alley)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food, be at bowl alley)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hot dog, be at bowl alley)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food, be at bowl alley)