hot dog: be at freezer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, soft drink
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at freezer 1.00
be at refrigerator 0.87
be at jar 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be at freezer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot sauce, be at refrigerator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be at freezer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(hot sauce, be at jar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(hot dog, be at freezer)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(hot sauce, be at refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hot sauce, be at refrigerator)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(hot dog, be at freezer)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(hot sauce, be at jar)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(hot sauce, be at jar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(hot dog, be at freezer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(hot dog, be at freezer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(hot dog, be at freezer)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hot dog, be at freezer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be at freezer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(hot dog, be at freezer)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hot dog, be at freezer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be at freezer)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hot sauce, be at refrigerator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be at freezer)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hot sauce, be at jar)