hot dog: be famous to chicago

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, pizza
Weight: 0.34
, twinkies
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be famous to chicago 1.00
be important to chicago 0.96
be famous in new york 0.81
be in toronto 0.79
england italy fro 0.77
be popular to american 0.76
be expensive in perth 0.76
be important in italy 0.76
be in usa 0.76
be important to italy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pizza, england italy fro)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be important in italy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be important to italy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(pizza, england italy fro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pizza, england italy fro)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(pizza, be important in italy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pizza, be important in italy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pizza, be important to italy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(pizza, be important to italy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(hot dog, be famous to chicago)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hot dog, be important to chicago)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hot dog, be important to chicago)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be important to chicago)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hot dog, be famous in new york)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(hot dog, be famous in new york)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be important to chicago)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be famous in new york)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hot dog, be popular to american)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(hot dog, be popular to american)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be popular to american)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be famous in new york)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be popular to american)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be famous to chicago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hot dog, be famous to chicago)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pizza, england italy fro)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pizza, be important in italy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be famous to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pizza, be important to italy)