hot dog: called dog

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, pizza
Weight: 0.34
, twinkies
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
called dog 1.00
be called dog 1.00
be called dogs 0.94
called hot dog 0.93
be called hot dog 0.93
be named dog 0.93
is dogs 0.91
be named hot dog 0.89
be called hot dogs 0.88
be bad for dogs 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dog food, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(dog food, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(hot dog, called dog)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(hot dog, called hot dog)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hot dog, is dogs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for dogs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(hot dog, be bad for dogs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be bad for dogs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hot dog, be called hot dog)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hot dog, be called dog)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hot dog, be called hot dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be named dog)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hot dog, is dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(hot dog, called hot dog)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hot dog, be named dog)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be named dog)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hot dog, be named hot dog)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be called dog)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be called dog)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(hot dog, be named dog)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be called dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be called hot dog)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hot dog, be called dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be called dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be called hot dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(hot dog, be called dog)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be called hot dog)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, called hot dog)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be named hot dog)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is dogs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be named hot dog)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(hot dog, is dogs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(hot dog, be called dogs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(hot dog, called hot dog)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be called hot dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(hot dog, be called hot dog)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(hot dog, be called hot dogs)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(hot dog, be named hot dog)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, called dog)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hot dog, called dog)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, called dog)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for dogs)