hot dog: has lot of fat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, soft drink
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has lot of fat 1.00
be fat 0.91
be high in fat 0.89
has lot of sugar 0.81
has many calorie but few vitamin 0.80
be fatty 0.78
be make from several kind of meat 0.76
be made of several kind of meat 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fast food, be fatty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hot dog, has lot of fat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, has lot of sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hot dog, has lot of fat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hot dog, has lot of fat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(junk food, has lot of sugar)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fast food, be fatty)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has lot of sugar)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be fatty)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, has lot of sugar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fast food, be fatty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hot dog, has lot of fat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, has lot of sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hot dog, has lot of fat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hot dog, has lot of fat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(chocolate bar, has lot of sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, has lot of sugar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hot dog, has lot of fat)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be high in fat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be fat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hot dog, be fat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hot dog, be high in fat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be fat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(hot dog, be make from several kind of meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be make from several kind of meat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hot dog, be made of several kind of meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be high in fat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be made of several kind of meat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be make from several kind of meat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be made of several kind of meat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hot dog, be fat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hot dog, be made of several kind of meat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hot dog, be high in fat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hot dog, be make from several kind of meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hot dog, has lot of fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fast food, be fatty)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(junk food, has lot of sugar)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, has lot of sugar)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fast food, be fatty)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(junk food, has lot of sugar)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hot dog, has lot of fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)