hot dog: have carbs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, pizza
Weight: 0.34
, twinkies
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have carbs 1.00
be bad for diet 0.79
have sodium 0.76
be worse than plant fats 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(fast food, have sodium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hot dog, have carbs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(animal fat, be worse than plant fats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hot dog, have carbs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hot dog, have carbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(animal fat, be worse than plant fats)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hot dog, have carbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fast food, have sodium)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, have carbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fast food, have sodium)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, have carbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(animal fat, be worse than plant fats)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(fast food, have sodium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hot dog, have carbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hot dog, have carbs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(animal fat, be worse than plant fats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hot dog, have carbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hot dog, have carbs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hot dog, have carbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(hot dog, have carbs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(hot dog, have carbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hot dog, have carbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, have carbs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hot dog, have carbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hot dog, have carbs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, have carbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(animal fat, be worse than plant fats)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, have carbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, have sodium)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(hot dog, have carbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(animal fat, be worse than plant fats)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(hot dog, have carbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, have sodium)