hot dog: is gross

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, pizza
Weight: 0.34
, twinkies
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is gross 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is gross)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(dog food, is gross)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(hot dog, is gross)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(dog food, is gross)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(dog food, is gross)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(hot dog, is gross)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(hot dog, is gross)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(hot dog, is gross)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hot dog, is gross)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is gross)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(hot dog, is gross)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hot dog, is gross)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is gross)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(dog food, is gross)