hot dog: is junk food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, pizza
Weight: 0.34
, twinkies
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is junk food 1.00
is fast food 0.77
be in fast food 0.77
is food ever 0.77
be called fast food 0.77
is foods 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(junk food, is fast food)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hot dog, is junk food)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(fast food, be called fast food)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hot dog, is junk food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fast food, be called fast food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(junk food, is fast food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is fast food)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be called fast food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is junk food)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be in fast food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(junk food, is fast food)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(hot dog, is junk food)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(fast food, be called fast food)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(hot dog, is junk food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(pizza, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pizza, is junk food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pizza, be in fast food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pizza, be in fast food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(hot dog, is junk food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is junk food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hot dog, is junk food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fast food, be called fast food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(junk food, is fast food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pizza, is junk food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pizza, be in fast food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fast food, be called fast food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(hot dog, is junk food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(junk food, is fast food)