hot weather: be linked to violent crime

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, weather
Weight: 0.61
, heat
Weight: 0.57
, everything
Weight: 0.55
, thunderstorm
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cold weather
Weight: 0.60
, bad weather
Weight: 0.38
, good weather
Weight: 0.37
, cold
Weight: 0.35
, heat pump
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be linked to violent crime 1.00
be linked to more violent crime 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(weather, be linked to more violent crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hot weather, be linked to violent crime)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hot weather, be linked to violent crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(weather, be linked to more violent crime)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(hot weather, be linked to violent crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(weather, be linked to more violent crime)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(weather, be linked to more violent crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(hot weather, be linked to violent crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hot weather, be linked to violent crime)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hot weather, be linked to violent crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(hot weather, be linked to violent crime)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hot weather, be linked to violent crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hot weather, be linked to more violent crime)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(hot weather, be linked to violent crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hot weather, be linked to more violent crime)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hot weather, be linked to violent crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(hot weather, be linked to more violent crime)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hot weather, be linked to violent crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(hot weather, be linked to more violent crime)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(hot weather, be linked to violent crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hot weather, be linked to violent crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(hot weather, be linked to violent crime)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hot weather, be linked to violent crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hot weather, be linked to violent crime)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(hot weather, be linked to violent crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(weather, be linked to more violent crime)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hot weather, be linked to violent crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(weather, be linked to more violent crime)