hot weather: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, weather
Weight: 0.61
, heat
Weight: 0.57
, everything
Weight: 0.55
, thunderstorm
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cold weather
Weight: 0.60
, bad weather
Weight: 0.38
, good weather
Weight: 0.37
, cold
Weight: 0.35
, heat pump
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality joke 0.80
has quality jokes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hot weather, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(weather, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(weather, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cold weather, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(good weather, has quality jokes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hot weather, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(cold weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(cold weather, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(good weather, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(good weather, has quality jokes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(hot weather, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hot weather, has quality jokes)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hot weather, has quality joke)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hot weather, has quality joke)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hot weather, has quality jokes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(hot weather, has quality joke)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(hot weather, has quality jokes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(hot weather, has quality jokes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(hot weather, has quality joke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot weather, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hot weather, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(weather, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cold weather, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(good weather, has quality jokes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(hot weather, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(weather, has quality bad)