hotdog: be eat at picnic

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be eat at picnic 1.00
be used to eat 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotdog, be eat at picnic)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(hotdog, be eat at picnic)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hotdog, be eat at picnic)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hotdog, be used to eat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hotdog, be eat at picnic)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hotdog, be used to eat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(hotdog, be eat at picnic)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hotdog, be used to eat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotdog, be eat at picnic)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(hotdog, be used to eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(hotdog, be eat at picnic)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hotdog, be eat at picnic)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hotdog, be eat at picnic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotdog, be eat at picnic)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hotdog, be eat at picnic)