hotel: be at city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tourist
Weight: 0.67
, airport
Weight: 0.65
, park
Weight: 0.63
, stay
Weight: 0.61
Siblings hotel room
Weight: 0.83
, spa
Weight: 0.68
, bed
Weight: 0.63
, downtown
Weight: 0.62
, subway station
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at city 1.00
be at large city 0.88
be at big city 0.87
be used to stay in city 0.85
be at town 0.85
be at city underground 0.82
be at state park 0.80
leave town 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(park, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hotel, be at city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tourist, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hotel, be at city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tourist, leave town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hotel, be at city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(park, be at city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tourist, be at state park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tourist, leave town)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(park, be at city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be at state park)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(tourist, leave town)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, be at city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(subway station, be at city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(subway station, be at city underground)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, be used to stay in city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(subway station, be at large city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(subway station, be at big city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(park, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(hotel, be at city)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tourist, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(hotel, be at city)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tourist, leave town) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(hotel, be at city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(subway station, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(subway station, be at city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(subway station, be at large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(subway station, be at large city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(hotel room, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(hotel room, be at city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(subway station, be at big city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(subway station, be at big city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(hotel room, be used to stay in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(hotel room, be used to stay in city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(subway station, be at city underground) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(subway station, be at city underground)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hotel, be at city)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(hotel, be at town)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at town)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(hotel, be at town)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hotel, be at town)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hotel, be at city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(park, be at city)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tourist, leave town)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tourist, be at state park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hotel room, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(subway station, be at city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hotel room, be used to stay in city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(subway station, be at large city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(subway station, be at city underground)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(subway station, be at big city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(park, be at city)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tourist, leave town)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(hotel, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tourist, be at state park)