housing: be expensive in bay area

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.63
, real estate
Weight: 0.63
, department
Weight: 0.61
, commodity
Weight: 0.60
Siblings condo
Weight: 0.34
, condominium
Weight: 0.34
, townhouse
Weight: 0.33
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in bay area 1.00
be insane in sf bay area 0.80
be on waterfront more expensive 0.78
be on waterfront expensive 0.78
be in riverside expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(real estate, be on waterfront expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in bay area)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(real estate, be on waterfront more expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in bay area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(real estate, be on waterfront more expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(real estate, be on waterfront expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be on waterfront more expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be on waterfront expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(real estate, be on waterfront more expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in bay area)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(real estate, be on waterfront expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in bay area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in bay area)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(housing, be insane in sf bay area)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(housing, be insane in sf bay area)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(housing, be insane in sf bay area)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(housing, be insane in sf bay area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in bay area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in bay area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(real estate, be on waterfront expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(real estate, be on waterfront more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(real estate, be on waterfront expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(housing, be expensive in bay area)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(real estate, be on waterfront more expensive)