housing: be expensive in new zealand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.63
, real estate
Weight: 0.63
, department
Weight: 0.61
, commodity
Weight: 0.60
Siblings condo
Weight: 0.34
, condominium
Weight: 0.34
, townhouse
Weight: 0.33
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in new zealand 1.00
be expensive in zealand 0.98
be in australia expensive 0.84
be in canada expensive 0.82
be expensive in canada 0.82
is cheaper uk 0.82
be expensive in india 0.82
be expensive in connecticut 0.78
be expensive in oregon 0.78
be expensive in california 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in california)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in california)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in canada)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, is cheaper uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(townhouse, is cheaper uk)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(townhouse, is cheaper uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in new zealand)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in zealand)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(housing, be in canada expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(housing, be in canada expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in canada)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in canada expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(housing, be in australia expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(housing, be in canada expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in oregon)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in oregon)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in oregon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in oregon)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in california)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in india)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in canada)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(townhouse, is cheaper uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in canada)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in india)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in california)