housing: be expensive in zealand

Related concepts

Parents	concern Weight: 0.63 , real estate Weight: 0.63 , department Weight: 0.61 , commodity Weight: 0.60
Siblings	condo Weight: 0.34 , condominium Weight: 0.34 , townhouse Weight: 0.33 , real estate agent Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be expensive in zealand	1.00
be expensive in new zealand	0.98
be in australia expensive	0.86
be in canada expensive	0.83
be expensive in canada	0.83
be expensive in india	0.83
is cheaper uk	0.82
be in australia	0.80
be expensive in connecticut	0.79
be expensive in oregon	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(real estate, be expensive in connecticut) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(concern, be in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(concern, be in australia)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(concern, be in australia)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in canada)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(townhouse, is cheaper uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(real estate, be expensive in connecticut) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(concern, be in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(townhouse, is cheaper uk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(townhouse, is cheaper uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in zealand)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(housing, be in canada expensive)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(housing, be in canada expensive)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(housing, be in canada expensive)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in canada)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(housing, be in canada expensive)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in oregon)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in oregon)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(housing, be in australia expensive)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in new zealand)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in oregon)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in canada)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in new zealand)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in oregon)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in new zealand)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(housing, be in australia)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in new zealand)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(housing, be in australia)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(housing, be in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(concern, be in australia)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in india)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in canada)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(townhouse, is cheaper uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(concern, be in australia)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in india)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in canada)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)