housing: be in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.63
, real estate
Weight: 0.63
, department
Weight: 0.61
, commodity
Weight: 0.60
Siblings condo
Weight: 0.34
, condominium
Weight: 0.34
, townhouse
Weight: 0.33
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in australia 1.00
be in australia expensive 0.96
be in canada 0.87
be in canada expensive 0.84
be expensive in canada 0.84
is uk 0.82
be expensive in zealand 0.80
be expensive in india 0.80
be in denmark 0.79
grow in india 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(housing, be in australia)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(housing, be in australia)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(real estate, grow in india)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(housing, be in australia)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(concern, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(housing, be in australia)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(real estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(housing, be in australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(concern, be in australia)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(real estate, be in denmark)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(real estate, grow in india)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(concern, be in australia)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be in denmark)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in canada)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in india)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(real estate, grow in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(housing, be in australia)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(housing, be in australia)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(real estate, grow in india)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(housing, be in australia)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(concern, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(housing, be in australia)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(real estate, be in denmark)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(housing, be in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(townhouse, is uk)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(townhouse, is uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(housing, be in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(housing, be in australia expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(housing, be in canada)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(housing, be in australia expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(housing, be in canada)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(housing, be in australia expensive)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(housing, be in canada)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(housing, be in canada expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in canada)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(housing, be in canada expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(housing, be in canada expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in canada expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in canada)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in canada)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in canada)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in zealand)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in zealand)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in zealand)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in zealand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(housing, be in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(concern, be in australia)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(real estate, be in denmark)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in canada)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(real estate, grow in india)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(townhouse, is uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(concern, be in australia)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(real estate, be in denmark)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in canada)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(real estate, grow in india)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(housing, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in india)