housing: be in hawaii

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.63
, real estate
Weight: 0.63
, department
Weight: 0.61
, commodity
Weight: 0.60
Siblings condo
Weight: 0.34
, condominium
Weight: 0.34
, townhouse
Weight: 0.33
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in hawaii 1.00
be in hawaii expensive 0.95
be in california 0.79
be expensive in seattle 0.79
be expensive in utah 0.79
be expensive in california 0.78
be in california expensive 0.78
be expensive in san diego 0.78
be in houston 0.78
be expensive in connecticut 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(housing, be in hawaii)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(housing, be in hawaii)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(housing, be in hawaii)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in california)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in california)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(housing, be in hawaii)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(housing, be in hawaii)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(housing, be in hawaii)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(housing, be in hawaii)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii expensive)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(housing, be in hawaii expensive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(housing, be in hawaii expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(housing, be in hawaii expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in california expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(housing, be in california expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in san diego)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(housing, be in houston)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in houston)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in california)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(housing, be in california expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(housing, be in houston)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(housing, be in houston)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in san diego)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(housing, be in california expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in utah)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(housing, be in california)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in utah)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in utah)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in san diego)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in san diego)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(housing, be in california)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in utah)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(housing, be in california)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in california)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(housing, be in hawaii)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in california)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in seattle)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in california)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(housing, be in hawaii)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)