houston: be better than dallas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents texas
Weight: 0.67
, location
Weight: 0.59
, team
Weight: 0.58
, atlanta
Weight: 0.58
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.36
, new mexico
Weight: 0.36
, dallas
Weight: 0.35
, north carolina
Weight: 0.35
, new orleans
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than dallas 1.00
be favored over dallas 0.90
be called houston 0.83
's in atlanta 0.81
was named after sam houston 0.81
be named houston 0.79
be important to texas 0.78
be important city of texas 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(dallas, be important to texas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(dallas, be important to texas)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(dallas, be important to texas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(houston, be better than dallas)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(houston, be favored over dallas)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(houston, be called houston)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(houston, 's in atlanta)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(houston, 's in atlanta)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(houston, be named houston)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(houston, 's in atlanta)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(houston, be favored over dallas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(houston, was named after sam houston)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(houston, was named after sam houston)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(houston, 's in atlanta)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(houston, be called houston)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(houston, be called houston)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(houston, be called houston)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(houston, be named houston)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(houston, be important city of texas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(houston, be important to texas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(houston, be named houston)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(houston, was named after sam houston)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(houston, was named after sam houston)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(houston, be named houston)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(houston, was named after sam houston)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(houston, was named after sam houston)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(houston, was named after sam houston)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(houston, was named after sam houston)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(houston, be favored over dallas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(houston, be important to texas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(houston, be important city of texas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(houston, be favored over dallas)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(houston, be important to texas)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(houston, be important city of texas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(houston, be important to texas)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(houston, be important city of texas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(houston, be better than dallas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(houston, be better than dallas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(houston, be better than dallas)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(dallas, be important to texas)