houston: wear blue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents texas
Weight: 0.67
, location
Weight: 0.59
, team
Weight: 0.58
, atlanta
Weight: 0.58
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.36
, new mexico
Weight: 0.36
, dallas
Weight: 0.35
, north carolina
Weight: 0.35
, new orleans
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear blue 1.00
wear old hoxtons mask 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(team, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(houston, wear blue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(houston, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(team, wear blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(houston, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(team, wear blue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(team, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(houston, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(houston, wear blue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(houston, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(houston, wear blue)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(houston, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(houston, wear old hoxtons mask)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(houston, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(houston, wear old hoxtons mask)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(houston, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(houston, wear old hoxtons mask)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(houston, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(houston, wear old hoxtons mask)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(houston, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(houston, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(houston, wear blue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(houston, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(houston, wear blue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(houston, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(team, wear blue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(houston, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(team, wear blue)