human being: were different

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, person
Weight: 0.69
, human life
Weight: 0.69
, organism
Weight: 0.66
Siblings human body
Weight: 0.73
, other people
Weight: 0.71
, business people
Weight: 0.64
, planet earth
Weight: 0.64
, everyone
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
were different 1.00
is different 0.90
have different types 0.85
eat different kinds 0.80
have different colors 0.79
be different than other forms of life 0.78
have different blood groups 0.76
eat different kinds of food 0.76
have different types of teeth 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(human being, were different)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(everyone, is different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(human being, were different)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(everyone, is different)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(everyone, is different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(human being, were different)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(human being, is different)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(human being, have different types)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(human being, be different than other forms of life)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(human being, have different types of teeth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(human being, eat different kinds of food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(human being, is different)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(human being, have different types of teeth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(human being, have different types of teeth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(human being, have different types)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(human being, eat different kinds of food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(human being, have different types of teeth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(human being, be different than other forms of life)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(human being, eat different kinds of food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(human being, have different types)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(human being, is different)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(human being, have different types)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(human being, is different)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(human being, be different than other forms of life)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(human being, be different than other forms of life)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(human being, eat different kinds of food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(human being, were different)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(human being, were different)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(human being, were different)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(human being, were different)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(everyone, is different)