human eye: be very complex

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents eye
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, lens
Weight: 0.62
, camera
Weight: 0.60
, image
Weight: 0.59
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.36
, human life
Weight: 0.36
, eye contact
Weight: 0.35
, human body
Weight: 0.35
, human head
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be very complex 1.00
has evolve into complex structure 0.83
be very delicate 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(eye, has evolve into complex structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(human eye, be very complex)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(human eye, be very complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(eye, has evolve into complex structure)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(human eye, be very complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(eye, has evolve into complex structure)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(eye, has evolve into complex structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(human eye, be very complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(human eye, be very complex)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(human eye, be very complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(human eye, be very complex)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(human eye, be very complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(human eye, be very delicate)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(human eye, be very complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(human eye, be very delicate)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(human eye, be very complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(human eye, be very delicate)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(human eye, be very complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(human eye, be very delicate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(human eye, be very complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(human eye, be very complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(human eye, be very complex)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(human eye, be very complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(human eye, be very complex)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(human eye, be very complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(eye, has evolve into complex structure)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(human eye, be very complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(eye, has evolve into complex structure)