human: fall in love

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monster
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, person
Weight: 0.62
, form
Weight: 0.62
, living thing
Weight: 0.61
Siblings human being
Weight: 0.38
, wild animal
Weight: 0.35
, creature
Weight: 0.34
, one person
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
fall in love 1.00
fall again again in love 0.89
relate heart with love 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(monster, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(human, fall in love)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(human, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(monster, fall in love)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(human, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(monster, fall in love)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(monster, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(human, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(human, fall in love)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(human, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(human, fall in love)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(human, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(human, fall again again in love)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(human, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(human, fall again again in love)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(human, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(human, fall again again in love)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(human, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(human, fall again again in love)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(human, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(human, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(human, fall in love)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(human, fall in love)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(human, fall in love)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(human, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(monster, fall in love)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(human, fall in love)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(monster, fall in love)